// tag

#naming science

// ESSAY
// Naming Methodology

Why some brand names are unforgettable, and the memory science of distinctive names

Some names are easier to pull from memory because they break their category's pattern and because the mind retrieves real words more reliably than invented ones.

11 min · 2026.06.19
// ESSAY
// Naming Methodology

What 5,000 brand names sound like

Run 5,000 DTC names through a phonetic sieve and one average name falls out. It does not exist, and it would sit unnoticed on any shelf. Here is the read.

12 min · 2026.06.19
// ESSAY
// Naming Methodology

Processing fluency in brand names, why the mind trusts what it can say easily

Processing fluency is how easily a name moves through the mind, and the mind quietly trusts what moves easily. The science, and the levers that set it.

11 min · 2026.06.18
// ESSAY
// Naming Methodology

We analyzed 5,000 DTC brand names. Only 27% are invented words.

Most naming advice says invent a word. Across 5,018 real direct-to-consumer brand names, only about a quarter are, and the most common move is borrowing a word that already exists.

10 min · 2026.06.17
// ESSAY
// Naming Methodology

The naming science glossary

A plain-English glossary of the science that decides how a brand name lands, sound symbolism, processing fluency, optimal incongruity and the rest, each defined with the research behind it.

10 min · 2026.06.17
// ESSAY
// Naming Methodology

Why polarizing names beat the safe ones

The choice was never safe or polarizing. It is where your name sits on one curve, and the names that win break the category's pattern just enough to be noticed while staying easy to say.

9 min · 2026.06.17
// ESSAY
// Naming Methodology

Sound symbolism in brand names, is it real and how to use it

Run a 60-second test on yourself, see why the effect has held for almost a century, then turn the two phonetic dials a founder actually controls.

12 min · 2026.06.15